#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal Looking at my own bilingualism through this extraordinary prism it helped explode it out and stopped me making bald statements or hard and fast decisions. I began to look at what it was to be bilingual after having been racially abused on the 123 bus for speaking Irish, by an Irishwoman, in her sixties. She is hated and adored and she could be simultaneously funny, irreverent, pious. She was literate in English but illiterate, in the “pen and paper” sense in Irish. The Sayers family were Protestant Cromwellian landed genrty whose descendent ended up being one of the most famous storytellers in Europe in a language they wouldn’t originally have spoken.
In the true sense she represents the complexity of us and she challenges us to examine and celebrate who we are.
Peig, the most hated woman in Irish history, is really a reflection of us. He believes no country can be truly innovative if people do not know who they are, where they are from and where they are trying to go.Īnd that of course, was my starting point. This was not a Celtic Scholar or an Irish language Scholar, but a Doctor of Business Studies and Enterprise and his assertion was that to deny Peig is to deny ourselves the opportunity to develop an innovative self-reliant Ireland, a unique and cosmopolitan nation that is properly able to compete in a turbulent global economy. How tradition represents a valuable asset that can foster that very creativity. How tradition is not some dead artefact but a living resource which helps us rediscover our history in order to shape our future. He talked about how the meandering interconnectedness and rich imagery of Peig’s stories offer meaning and self-discovery, ideal for nurturing creativity and innovation. He talked about the need to challenge orthodoxies. And that whatever he could do he would do. He was delighted he said, to get the email. I had heard him speak the year before and he had mentioned Peig in his lecture. It was a scholar that I had contacted about the show, to see if he had the time to chat and perhaps to get a quote from him. I questioned the whole enterprise. And just as I was thinking – I will ring Kris Nelson at Tiger Fringe and tell him thank you very much it was really nice of him to include Eating Seals and Seagulls’ Eggs in the programme but that it would probably be best, for all involved, if we somehow could just not do the show – my phone rang. Last weekend was a moment like that for me. The talent of collaborators helps of course, and I am particularly blessed in that regard, working with Adam Gibney, Louise Lewis, Ella Clarke, Veronica Dyas, Niall Toner and Les Keye.īut the nagging question persists, and while you want to discuss it with the rest of the team, you don’t want to derail the train with doubt, so really your only choice is to keep going despite the internal questions, despite the wondering. The air vibrates with this big dirty ‘Why?” and the question can loom even larger and dirtier when you have been mad enough to think that you can conceive, write and perform in the piece. THERE IS A moment in every production where you wonder exactly why you’re doing it, when you ask yourself just what is the point of it at this precise moment in time?
0 kommentar(er)
